Back in 2017, Anup Agarwal wanted to raise $2 million for funding his maiden venture Mintifi. He got rejected by 20 funds. In 2023, he raised $120 million on the back of a profitable and thriving fintech venture
Mumbai, 2017. The investment banker was bemused. “How is it possible,” wondered Anup Agarwal, who had spent eight years at Jefferies, and five years at Kotak Investment Banking. Now, when he was taking the entrepreneurial plunge, the greenhorn met with a spate of stunning rejections. “Are they serious,” the chartered accountant pondered as he tried to make some sense of the “utter nonsense” that was happening around him. “Guys, what I am asking for is just $2 million,” the rookie founder pleaded his case and flaunted his enviable background where he helped umpteen founders raise millions of venture and private equity dollar, stitched innumerable mergers and acquisition deals, and closed countless high-ticket transactions.
Nothing worked, though. For close to two decades, Agarwal wielded power, framed the rules of the game and adjudged the winners during his investment banking career. Now, the tables turned, a bunch of Ivy School hotshots made the banking veteran feel like an amateur, and nobody was keen to take a punt on the seasoned professional who had so far faced 20 rejections. “I don’t think your startup can ever mint money,” snubbed one of the VCs. “At times, you have to swallow your pride and ego,” says Agarwal, who was dejected by incessant rebuffs.
Meanwhile, time was running out for the fledgling venture. Mintifi, a B2B supply chain financing firm that was started by Agarwal, Ankit Mehta and Sanjoy Shome in 2017, had so far managed to run the show by using half a million dollars that Agarwal had pumped into the business. After almost a year of bootstrapped life, Mintifi now needed venture money to grow. Though the idea behind Mintifi was freshly minted, the funding pitch unfortunately was viewed by the VCs from a stale lens: Yet another fintech, yet another NBFC, and yet another clone in a cluttered market. There were no takers.
Five years later, in July 2022, there were again no takers. This time, Agarwal was stunned beyond belief. It had just been four months since Mintifi closed the Series C round of funding of $40 million in February 2022, and now the founder was again out in the market to raise a new round. The desperation to raise more was not hard to fathom. First, Mintifi was growing at a furious pace. Look at the numbers. From ₹30 crore in FY19, the amount disbursed in FY22 stood at a staggering ₹1,500 crore; and the revenue during the same period jumped from ₹2.8 crore to ₹59 crore. In a business where the core raw material happens to be money, Mintifi needed more money to keep the rocket cruising. And there was a compelling reason to believe that the founders would be amply rewarded. Why? After three consecutive years of losses, Mintifi had posted a tidy profit of ₹3 crore in FY22.
The second reason to raise back-to-back rounds of money stemmed from macro factors. The previous year, the global fintech world was in turmoil. In June 2022, the stock of the American online lender Affirm had plunged 78 percent from its valuation high of $12 billion. The following month, in July, it was the turn of Europe’s highest-valued startup to face the heat. Klarna’s valuation was slashed by 85 percent to $6.7 billion from $45 billion. Sweden’s fintech major, best known for its ‘buy now pay later’ service, was in the midst of a meltdown. Most of the fintech players, too, faced a similar fate, which triggered a knee-jerk reaction from investors. First, they shunned fintech stocks and investments. Second, fintech was left in a bitter funding cold.
Back in India, Agarwal had a weird issue to contend with. “I don’t think you guys are serious,” was the reaction of most of the VCs. And nobody could blame them for their disbelief. It had just been four months since the last fund raise. “Why do you need money now? What happened to the capital that you raised in the last round…,” were the questions hurled at Agarwal, who answered them to the best of his abilities. But it didn’t cut ice.
After a month, the founder saw some interest from a section of VCs. But the needle didn’t move. Why? All of them wanted to put money at the last round’s valuation. “Guys, it has just been four months. What do you expect,” they tried to reason with the founder who had reportedly raised the Series C round in February at a $150-million valuation. Agarwal, though, had valid reasons to ask for more. Mintifi had grown 2.5x in just five months. “How could we settle for the old valuation,” he argued. There was no meeting ground, and Mintifi stopped exploring the market.
